Anyone who was able to pass through an experience was not guilty, whereas those who did not were guilty. In fact, the book written by Carr in 1961 What is History? has seen a much longer shelf life than many works in actual historical. The most famous incidents is The Ordeal of Water.

However, it is a fascinating reality that what is History? is still the most sought-after reference for both students and teachers. The victim was bound to a rope and then thrown into a pool of water. For one thing Carr’s arguments and the debates to which Carr contributed might seem to us, as we attempt to address the question as old-fashioned. If they were able to get out, they would be aided by Satan, guilty and sentenced to death. The 60 years that followed encompass postmodernism and the rise of gender studies, and the’memory boom’, to mention just a few examples. If they drowned, the person was innocent, and died.

Today’s students live in a different world of learning. The procedure was usually administered to witches accused of being witches. Carr’s theories are more in line with the current sensibilities of our time than those of his opponents, cheap who remained committed to the idea the objective history, free from any current notions. Catholicism as well as The Protestant Reformation. Contrarily, Carr saw history as fundamentally a field of problem-solving. The practices that were enacted by the Catholic Church had a significant influence on and influenced the Protestant Reformation. History scholars should not only rid from the belief that they can somehow be apart from the world they reside, he suggested.

Martin Luther and many reformers were not in favor of the sale of indulgences. They should actually accept the notion that their study of the past is tailored to the demands of the current. The Church, they believed was greedy and money could not guarantee a person’s spot in Heaven. One can instantly discern the attraction of this argument today. Another reason why people stopped believing within their Catholic church was due to that of the Bubonic Plague. In a society where humanities scholars are being pressured more than ever to justify their importance more than ever, studying the past ‘for the past’s sake’ doesn’t cut the mustard.

Priests were unable to heal those suffering from the disease. However, I’m not sure this is all there is. Many people passed away and their families retreated away from the Catholic Church. In my opinion, the long-running fascination with Carr has something far more fundamental in the way we see the relation between the past and the present. The Spanish Inquisition. In particular, we’re likely to be less inclined than past generations to make rigid distinctions between ‘history’, on the one hand and’memory or ‘heritage’, to the contrary.

The pope Alexander VI gave the Spanish monarchs Ferdinand of Aragon and Isabella of Castile the power to establish the Spanish Inquisition. In addition we’re more democratic as to what we consider history to belong to: to whom are the people who have lived through it and how those is able to benefit from the knowledge it provides. The purpose of the Inquisition was designed to identify non-Catholics and force them to confess to their heresy. Every historian views the relationship between the past and present in a unique way. Spain was anti-Muslim as well as anti-Semitic.

It was Carr’s biggest achievement to pinpoint the tensions that arise from this connection as the main foundation of the discipline. The year 1492 was the first time Jewish citizens were forced quit Spain, and the crown took their possessions. "Histories are helpful in telling how we got "here"’ The year 1502 was the time when Spain required Muslims to change their religion or to leave. Faridah Zaman Associate Professor of Historical Studies, University of Oxford. The goal of the Spanish Inquisition was to eliminate Jewish as well as Muslim people. One method to find the answer is to ask yourself what is history for and why?

The most common answer would be that historical accounts are valuable in revealing the story of how we got here. The Inquisitors tortured suspects until they admitted to the crime. They could include the origin story, of linear and possibly teleological accounts in which we are asked how we came to organize our society and our political structures in the manner that we are today for example? Or as the old quote suggests, it’s a set of lessons we should learn from to avoid the shame of repetition.

The result was bloody, violent moment. A deeper understanding of the history can reveal a more interesting and complicated – although not necessarily antithetical – possibility. Christianity was prevalent in Medieval Europe.

In the same way that we can examine the past in order to gain a better understanding of the numerous intricate ways our present-day world got its start historians may also set themselves the challenge of revealing possible worlds that have not been explored and possible futures that may have existed.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *